Critical Copyright, and more:
a select bibliography, with links
For further references, linked
as well, see the footnotes of my Principles for
Deciding Hard Copyright Cases.
Intellectual Property
· Jonathan M. Barnett, Is Intellectual Property Trivial?, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 157 (2009), p. 1691
· James Boyle, A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?, Duke Law Journal, vol. 47 (1997), p. 87
· Paul A. David and Dominique Foray, Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society, Policy Futures in Education, vol. 1 (2003), p. 20
· Brett M. Frischmann, Spillovers Theory and Its Conceptual Boundaries, William & Mary Law Review, vol. 51 (2009), p. 801
· Wendy J. Gordon, Of Harms and Benefits: Torts, Restitution, and Intellectual Property, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 21 (1992), p. 449
Mark A. Lemley, IP in a World Without Scarcity, vol.
· Robert P. Merges, The Relationship Between Foundations and Principles in IP Law, San Diego Law Review, vol. 49 (2012), p. 957
· Jerome H. Reichman, Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms, Columbia Law Review, vol. 94 (1994), p. 2432
· Pamela Samuelson, Enriching Discourse on Public Domains, Duke Law Journal, vol. 55 (2006), p. 783
· Tim Wu, Intellectual Property, Innovation, and
Decentralized Decisions, Virginia
Law Review, vol. 92 (2006), p. 123
Copyright and related rights in media productions
· Barton Beebe, Bleistein, the Problem of Aesthetic Progress, and the Making of American Copyright Law, Columbia Law Review, vol. 117 (2017), p. 319
· Tom W. Bell, Escape from Copyright: Market Success vs. Statutory Failure in the Protection of Expressive Works, University of Cincinnati Law Review, vol. 69 (2001), p. 741
· Peter Biddle, Paul England, Marcus Peinado, and Bryan Willman, The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution, in Digital Rights Management Workshop 2002, ed. J. Feigenbaum (Springer, 2003), p. 155
· Julie E. Cohen, Pervasively Distributed Copyright Enforcement, Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 95 (2006), p. 1
· Harold Demsetz, Creativity and the Economics of the Copyright Controversy, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, vol. 6, no. 2 (2009), p. 5
· Abraham Drassinower, Copyright is Not About Copying, Harvard Law Review Forum, vol. 125 (2012), p. 108
· Justin Hughes, Fair Use Across Time, UCLA Law Review, vol. 50 (2003), p. 775
·
Dan Hunter and
F. Gregory Lastowka, Amateur-to-Amateur,
William & Mary Law Review, vol.
46 (2004), p. 951
·
Stefan Larsson,
et al., Law, Norms, Piracy
and Online Anonymity — Practices of de-identification in the global file
sharing community, J. of Research in
Interactive Marketing, vol. 6, no. 4 (2012), p. 260
· Ejan Mackaay, Intellectual Property and the Internet: The Share of Sharing, in The Commodification of Information, eds. N. Netanel and N. Elkin-Koren (Kluwer, 2002), p. 133
· Eben Moglen, Anarchism Triumphant: Free Software and the Death of Copyright, First Monday, vol. 4, no. 8 (August 2, 1999)
· Guy Pessach, Deconstructing Disintermediation: A Skeptical Copyright Perspective, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 31 (2013), p. 833
· Alexander Peukert, A Bipolar Copyright System for the Digital Network Environment, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 28 (2005), p. 1
·
Jed Rubenfeld, The
Freedom of Imagination: Copyright’s Constitutionality, Yale Law Journal, vol. 112 (2002), p. 1
Patent and other rights in technologies and designs
· Oren Bar-Gill and Gideon Parchomovsky, The Value of Giving Away Secrets, Virginia Law Review, vol. 89 (2003), p. 1857
· Vincenzo Di Cataldo and Emanuela Arezzo, Scope of the Patent and Uses of the Product in the European Biotechnology Directive, Italian Intellectual Property, Yearbook 2006, p. 11
· Kevin Emerson Collins, Propertizing Thought, Southern Methodist University Law Review, vol. 60 (2007), p. 317
· Clarisa Long, Patent Signals, University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 69 (2002), p. 625
· Beth Simone Noveck, “Peer To Patent”: Collective Intelligence, Open Review and Patent Reform, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, vol. 20 (2006), p. 123
· Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Do Patents Disclose Useful Information?, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 25 (2012), p. 531
· Rudolph J.R. Peritz, Freedom to Experiment: Toward a Concept of Inventor Welfare, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, vol. 90 (2008), p. 245
· Jerome H. Reichman, Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation, Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 53 (2000), p. 1743
· Carl Shapiro, Navigating
the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting, in Innovation Policy and the Economy, eds. A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, and S. Scott (MIT Press, 2001), vol. 1, p.
119
Cyberlaw: governance within global networks
· Yochai Benkler, Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm, Yale Law Journal, vol. 112 (2002), p. 369
· A. Michael Froomkin, Habermas@discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace, Harvard Law Review, vol. 116 (2003), p. 749
· Dmytri Kleiner, with Joanne Richardson and Brian Wyrick, The Telekommunist Manifesto, Network Notebook 03, eds. Geert Lovink and Sabine Niederer (Institute of Network Cultures, 2010)
· Rachel O’Dwyer and Linda Doyle, This is not a Bit-Pipe: A Political Economy of the Substrate Network, The Fibreculture Journal, issue 20 (June 18, 2012), no. FCJ-138
· Joel R. Reidenberg, Technology and Internet Jurisdiction, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 153 (2005), p. 1951
· Lawrence Solum and Minn Chung, The Layers Principle: Internet Architecture and the Law, Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 79 (2004), p. 815